毒品犯罪争议问题研究  

On the Controversial Issues of Drug-related Crimes

作　　者：赵桂玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《政法学刊》2015年第6期56-61,共6页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：从立法层面讲,涉毒犯罪侵害了国家对毒品的管理制度,属于行为犯;从犯罪行为人角度讲,其目的并不是挑战国家对毒品的管理制度,归根结底还是为了谋取利益(不限于经济利益),因此,毒品犯罪属于目的犯,而不是行为犯。否则,单纯的购买、吸食毒品的行为也侵害了国家对毒品的管理制度,却不构成犯罪,对此,现有理论给不出合理的解释。毒品犯罪中,居间行为的推波助澜让毒品更加泛滥,也增加了毒品犯罪的隐秘性,对居间行为的定性及处罚在理论上存在争议。鉴于刑法对毒品犯罪处罚的严厉性,有必要对毒品犯罪的不能犯和未遂犯做出明确区分,以免不当扩大刑法的打击范围。From the perspective of legislation,drug- related crimes infringe on the national administration system on drugs and thus belong to behavioral offense. From the perspective of defrauders,their purpose is not to challenge the national administration system on drugs but to seek profits（ including but not limited to economic profits） ultimately. Therefore,drug- related crimes belong to purposeful crimes but not behavioral offenses. Otherwise,the pure purchasing and taking of drugs also infringing on the national drug management system does not constitute crime. For this aspect,the current theory can not give a reasonable explanation. In drug- related crimes,the intermediary behaviors add fuel to the fire so as to make the drugs more pervasive and increase the invisibility of drug- related crimes. However,disputes still exist in the determination and punishment of intermediary behaviors. In view of the criminal law on the severity of drug crimes,it is necessary to make a clear distinction between drug crimes and the attempted crime so as to avoid improper expansion of the scope of the criminal law.

关 键 词：毒品犯罪 居间行为 不能犯未遂 刑法修正案(九) 

分 类 号：DF636[政治法律—刑法学]