论涉众型网络犯罪中电子证据的审查与认定  

Examination and Authentication of Electronic Evidence in Public-related Cybercrime

作　　者：蔡杰[1] 娄超[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《北京邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第6期33-38,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：《关于办理网络犯罪案件适用刑事诉讼程序若干问题的意见》第一次对涉众型网络犯罪做出了官方定义,将其列为网络犯罪的四大类别之一。该类案件因波及的被害人众多且位置分散,而产生了证据审查与认定中的新困难。建议在形式审查中,将被告审核证据的时间提到庭审之前,依托侦查机关或检察机关的硬件设施,以庭前会议的方式,来保障辩方充分行使质证权;在内容验真时,建议区分静态存储和动态演示两类电子证据来审查。而司法解释中对于证据难以逐一查实的情况之规定,放宽了认定犯罪事实的尺度,但因有"排除合理怀疑"证明标准相冲突之嫌,故在实践中应从严适用为宜。The public-related cybercrime is first defined officially in The Act Concerning Several Issues of Criminal Procedure in Cybercrime（ 2014）,and it is classified as one of the four kinds of cybercrimes. New difficulties on the authentication of electronic evidence are created because this crime involves many victims who are in different places. The technological facilities in investigating institution or procuratorate can be used to ensure the defendant have enough time to examine the electronic evidence in pre-court session. It is suggested that static storage and dynamic demonstration should be examined separately in content verification. The Act provides a flexible measure. But the ＂beyond reasonable doubt＂proof standard should be obeyed; the court should apply this provision strictly.

关 键 词：网络犯罪 电子证据 证据法则 真实性审查 

分 类 号：D924.36[政治法律—刑法学] D925.213[政治法律—法学]