立宪政体中的协商民主:宪法商谈及其建制化  

Deliberative Democracy in Constitutional Regime: Constitutional Deliberation and its Institutionalization

作　　者：戴激涛[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东财经大学法学院,广东广州510320

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第2期22-29,共8页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC820012)中国特色宪法实施机制研究:协商民主的视角

摘　　要：作为晚近兴起的协商民主理论的规范性内核,宪法商谈体现了立宪政体的民主追求,是民主法治国实现协同治理的重要承诺。对于国家治理而言,宪法不仅是多元主体进行商谈的价值共识与行为准则,而且为转化政治分歧、实现多元主体的持续性合作提供了基本的结构性框架。中西学者建构的宪法商谈规范模型为推动我国立宪政体的稳健运行提供了有益启示:关注宪法文本,以完善违宪审查制度为中心增进权力机关的宪法商谈;改革人大议事规则,引入辩论机制,促进人大代表与社会民众的宪法商谈;尊重公民权利,建立公民宪法论坛,培育共和国公民的观念性宪法世界;落实信息公开等配套制度,保障宪法商谈的程序正义,构建程序合理、环节完整的社会主义协商民主制度体系。As an essential element of constitutional democracy,Constitutional deliberation is the normative core of deliberative democracy theory which was raised recently,and it becomes an important cooperation mechanism to achieve collaborative governance of contemporary countries. Through the comparison of Chinese and western scholars＇ normative models of constitutional deliberation,it can be found that the constitutional deliberation institutionalization is a beneficial path of promoting the institutionalization of deliberative democracy in constitutional regime. In order to building our double- track constitutional deliberation system,on one hand,we should take our constitutional text seriously,perfect the constitutional review system as the center and strive to promote the authorities＇ constitutional deliberation. On the other hand,we should respect the citizens＇ rights,establish civil constitutional forums and foster the republic＇s citizens＇ constitutional worldview,so as to keep the people＇s dynamic sovereignty of the constitution.

关 键 词：协商民主 宪法商谈 审议院 公众部门 观念性宪法世界 

分 类 号：DF21[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]