片面共犯肯定论的语义解释根据  

Semantic Basis for Theory of Unilateral Accomplice

作　　者：李强 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所,北京100720

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第2期52-58,共7页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：我国刑法学界在片面共犯的问题上,围绕《刑法》第25条第1款的规定,形成了不同意见。有人认为,应当肯定片面共犯,对片面共犯行为按照共同犯罪处理;有人认为,应否定片面共犯行为是共同犯罪,对其要么按照间接正犯或者单独犯处理,要么修改刑法就之作专门的处罚规定。这些意见的关键分歧是对"共同故意"的语义理解不同,但是二者在将解释《刑法》第25条第1款规定的重心置于"共同故意"以及将之解释为"共同的故意"这一点上却是一致的。然而,该款规定的语义解释重心应当是"共同故意犯罪"。根据基于汉语结构助词隐现规律的语义解释,"共同故意犯罪"可被解释为两种含义:"共同的故意地犯罪"以及"共同地故意地犯罪"。在后一种语义之下,片面共犯肯定论的立场可以得到维护。For the scholar discussions of unilateral accomplice,there are different opinions on the interpretation of Article 25,Paragraph 1 of Penal Code of China（ ＂A joint crime refers to an intentional crime committed by two or more persons jointly＂）. The key difference between these opinions is the semantic interpretation of＂joint crime＂. Based on the concealment and appearance of structural particle in Chinese,Article 25,Paragraph 1 of Penal Code could be interpreted as ＂a crime committed with a joint intention＂or＂an intentional crime committed jointly＂. Under the second interpretation,the theory of unilateral accomplice should be maintained.

关 键 词：片面共犯 共同故意 汉语结构助词隐现规律 语义解释 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]