经营者集中救济类型位阶性的理论反思  

Theoretical Reconsideration of the Hierarchical Nature of the Types of Merger Remedies

作　　者：袁日新[1] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳建筑大学文法学院,辽宁沈阳110168

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第2期59-69,共11页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC820132)"经营者集中救济法律制度研究--以不同产业的适用为中心视角"

摘　　要：经营者集中救济通常划分为结构性救济和行为性救济两种类型。结构性救济具有简单、明确并且易于监督等优点,但其设计、实施和监督也具有不可忽视的缺陷,因此其并不具有绝对优先性。行为性救济具有设计困难多、实施风险大和监督成本高等弊端,但这些弊端是完全可以消除的,因此其不只是具有辅助性。在经营者集中救济商谈过程中,经营者集中救济的类型选择取决于对救济目标能否实现的判断,具有一定的灵活性,要考虑本国具体情况,并且要接受效果评估。因此,立足于本国、本地区的反垄断法律体系,将市场环境、竞争损害、产业类型、效率、期限等因素加以综合考虑,凸显执法的实践理性,选择对具体个案最合适的救济类型,是比救济类型位阶性更为重要的问题。Merger remedies often are divided into Structural remedies and Behavioral remedies. In the eyes of most scholars,the types of merger remedies are hierarchical to some extent. In fact,this specious view is not only of very limited theoretical benefit,but also very little practical significance. Structural remedies are simple,clear and easy to monitor,but there are some defects in design,implementation and monitor,so they have no absolute preference. Although Behavioral remedies also have some difficulties in design,risks in implementation and costs in monitor,these would be removed completely,so they are not complementary tools. In the process of consultation of merger remedies,the choice of types of merger remedies depends on the decision of whether the objects of merger remedies could be realized,has some flexibility characteristics,should consider domestic concrete condition and accept effect assessment. It is more important to comprehensively take account of market environment,competition harm,industry types,efficiency,timing and so on based on own antimonopoly legal system,emphasize the practical logic of enforcement law,choose the most appropriate types of merger remedies for the particular case than to rank those different types.

关 键 词：经营者集中救济类型 结构性救济 行为性救济 

分 类 号：DF092[政治法律—法学理论]