论同一构成要件内的行为差误  

Study on the mistake of action in the scope of the same constitution

作　　者：樊建民[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第2期81-90,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：打击错误、方法错误的概念,不能准确描述行为差误的本质和特征,应以行为差误概念来取代。针对同一构成要件内的行为差误,法定符合说认定犯罪既遂的范围过大,具体符合说认定犯罪既遂的范围过小,行为计划理论不具有实际的可操作性。应构建递进式的理论体系来解决同一构成要件内行为差误的归责问题:预期结果与实害结果的等价性是判断故意犯罪既遂的基础条件;实害结果在行为所制造的危险范围内是判断故意犯罪既遂的客观限制条件;行为人对实害结果具有认识可能性是判断犯罪既遂的主观限制条件。The conception of mistake of attacking or means does not describe the nature and the characteristic of mistake of action accurately,so it should be replaced by mistake of action. In the scope of the same constitution,the scope of crime finished is too large according to the theory conforming to the legality,the scope of crime finished is too narrow according to the theory conforming to the concret,and the theory conforming to the plan of action is not applicable with practice. The model of theory in the proper order should be set up to settle the problem about the criminal responsibility of the mistake of action in the scope of the same constitution. The equal value between the expectant result and the practical result is the foundation being used to determine whether the crime being finished. The practical result being in the dangerous scope caused by the action is the objectively restrict factor whether the crime being finished. The possibilitiy of recognition to practical result is the subjectively restrict factor whether the crime being finished.

关 键 词：行为差误 预期结果 实害结果 犯罪既遂 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]