论转售价格维持的反垄断法规制  

The Anti-monopoly Law Regulation on Maintenance of Resale Prices

作　　者：曾晶[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《上海财经大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第2期116-128,共13页Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

基　　金：上海市哲学社会科学青年项目"转售价格维持反垄断法规制方法研究"(2015EFX005)

摘　　要：当今反垄断法在考察转售价格维持时,应适用合理规则,而不是本身违法规则。这主要分为两个步骤:首先,考察转售价格维持的负面效果,如果没有这类效果,则直接推定不予禁止;然后,再对有此效果的行为进行效率考察,如果该行为产生的效率能弥补其负面效果,则也不受禁止,反之则应禁止。2013年我国发展改革委员会和上海市高等法院处理的三个转售价格维持案件,均没有完整准确地把握这一方法,这将不利于我国反垄断法的实践。基于反垄断执法的现实需要,我国今后应结合国外成熟经验和本土实际情况,尽早摸索出可行的规制路径。The examination of the maintenance of resale prices on the anti-monopoly lawshould apply the rule of reason, rather than the per se rule at present. This is mainly divided into two steps, the first step is to examine the negative effect of the maintenance of resale prices, and if it has not such effect, it should presume that the maintenance of resale prices would not be pro- hibited directly; the second step is to examine whether it will bring efficiency if the maintenance of resale prices has such effect, and if this efficiency could compensate for the negative effect of the maintenance of resale prices, it also would not be prohibited; on the contrary, it would be prohibited. The National Development and Reform Commission and Shanghai High People＇s Court have processed three cases about the maintenance of resale prices in 2013, but they do not grasp this approach completely and accurately. It does not benefit the practice of anti-monopoly law in China. Based on the practical needs of anti-monopoly＇ s enforcement, henceforth China should combine mature foreign experience with domestic actual situation and find out a workable regulatory method as soon as possible.

关 键 词：转售价格维持 生产商价格卡特尔 零售商价格卡特尔 支配性零售商封锁手段 

分 类 号：F832.5[经济管理—金融学]