基于文献计量学的研究前沿指标体系及其对我国科学基金评审的借鉴意义  

The index system of research frontier based on bibliometrics and its impact on the evaluation of our National Science Fund

作　　者：范少萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国医学科学院医学信息研究所,北京100020

出　　处：《中国科学基金》2016年第2期171-178,共8页Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China

摘　　要：同行评议已经成为各国家确定国家级科学基金资助项目的主要方法,但该方法还存在不足之处,改进同行评议的方法之一是使用定量方法。欧盟研究理事会支持的DBF项目为将文献计量学的定量方法应用到项目评审过程中提供了良好的理论与实践方案。本文系统介绍了该项目中对研究前沿的定义、研究前沿指标、指标的计算方法、优缺点及有效性等方面的内容,并提出了几点我国科学基金项目评审工作今后在开展定量研究与实践方面可供参考的建议。本文对完善我国国家科学基金评审流程、提高评审工作效率、确保评审结果的公平性等方面具有一定的理论意义。Peer review has become the main method of evaluating national science foundation projects, but there are some shortcomings of this method, implementing quantitative method is one of the useful ways to refine the peer review process. DBF project, supported by European Research Council, uses bibliometric methods in the funding reviewing process, and provides a good theoretical and practical program. In this paper, we systematically described the DBF project, including the definition and indicators of research fron- tier, calculation of indicators, advantages and disadvantages of indicators, etc. Finally, put forward some advice to use quantitative methods to the national science foundation evaluation in the future. We hope this paper will produce certain theoretical value in upgrading the review process of national science fund, impro- ving review efficiency and ensuring the fairness of the evaluation results.

关 键 词：研究前沿 DBF项目 同行评议 文献计量学 基金评审 

分 类 号：G353.1[文化科学—情报学] G322