检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广西中医药大学附属瑞康医院,广西南宁530011
出 处:《中医药临床杂志》2016年第2期206-209,共4页Clinical Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:广西壮族自治区中医药管理局中医药专项课题(No.GZKZ0943)
摘 要:目的:观察以豁痰活血为治法的抗痫煎剂对具有痰瘀表现的原发性癫痫的临床疗效。方法:将符合诊断和治疗标准的80例原发性癫痫患者随机分为治疗组和对照组各40例。治疗组以抗痫煎剂联合常规抗癫痫药物治疗,对照组以常规抗癫痫药物治疗。结果:治疗组有效率95.0%,观察组有效率77.5%。2组临床有效率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。综合治疗后,癫痫中医症状比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后2组患者脑电图改善情况,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:治疗组治疗原发性癫痫的有效率优于对照组,治疗组在改善原发性癫痫患者中医临床症状、脑电图等方面也优于对照组,且治疗组不良反应较轻。Objective Observing the clinical efficacy of the anti-epileptic decoction that has the effect of resolving phlegm and activating blood on primary epilepsy. Methods The 80 patients were screened in strict accordance with the diagnosis and treatment standards. All subjects were randomized to divided into treatment and control groups of each 40 cases. Treatment: The treatment group: anti-epileptic decoction,conventional anti-epileptic drug treatment. Control group: conventional anti-epileptic drug treatment. Results The total efficiency was 95.0% in the Treatment group. The total efficiency was 77.5% in the control groups. The difference was statistically significant between the two groups(P〈0.05). Comparing the two groups were significant differences in clinical improvement of TCM after treatment(P〈0.05). After treatment,the difference was significant in improving EEG(P〈0.05). Conclusion The total efficiency on the treatment of epilepsy is that treatment group is better than the control group,treatment groups is also better than the control groups on improved TCM clinical and the EEG,and the treatment group had no significant adverse reactions.
分 类 号:R259[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.82.212