检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西安财经学院学报》2016年第3期38-44,共7页Journal of Xi’an University of Finance & Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目"分层线性模型在中国居民收入和消费及其关系研究中的应用"(13BTJ012)
摘 要:文章采用中国2004-2012年行业面板数据,基于多层次线性模型,研究了行业垄断对行业收入差距的直接影响和间接影响。研究发现:行业垄断对行业收入差距的直接影响和间接影响分别可以解释行业收入差距的6.30%和64.73%;行业垄断与人力资本和外商直接投资的交互项对行业工资的影响为负,说明中国垄断行业并不具备人力资本及效率优势,主要依靠瓜分本该归国家或全民所有的垄断利润而获取高额收入,因此,应将中国垄断行业的高收入问题归因于行政垄断。Based on the nonparametric Kernel density estimation, this paper found that Chinese industry income gap widening, high income and low income industry increasing, but did not appear polarization trend. This paper stud- ies both the direct and indirect effects of industrial monopoly on industry income gap by using the multi-level linear model. The results show that:the direct effects and indirect effects of industry monopoly on industry income gap can explain the industry income gap to the extent of 6. 30% and 64. 73% respectively. The scale of monopoly enter- prism in China is too big, so it shows extremely low efficiency in the use of human capital and foreign direct invest- ment. Relying on dividing up the monopoly profits which belongs to the country or the whole people to get the high income would only due to the judgment that administrative monopoly is the main reason of the problem of high income in Chinese monopoly industries.
关 键 词:行业垄断 行业特征 行业收入差距 非参数Kernel密度估计 多层次线性模型
分 类 号:F014.4[经济管理—政治经济学] F224.9
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.10.46