检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西省大气探测技术中心,南昌330029 [2]江西省防灾减灾科技园工程办公室,南昌330029
出 处:《气象水文海洋仪器》2016年第1期57-60,共4页Meteorological,Hydrological and Marine Instruments
摘 要:利用2014年10~11月南昌市艾溪湖湿地公园试验基地的智能气象站与自动气象站观测资料,对各气象要素进行对比分析并探讨了两者差异形成的原因。结果表明:两种观测方式的观测数据虽然有一定的差异,但在允许的精度范围内,其中平均地面最大风向风速、平均地面最高温度、平均地面最低湿度总体差值较大。除仪器的工作性能和工作原理造成的差异外,观测环境的变化和特殊的天气现象也是造成差异的重要原因。Using observational data from intelligent and automatic weather stations of Nanchang Ai Xi lake wetland park test base from October to November 2014,each meteorological element is analyzed and the reasons for differences between two stations are discussed.The results show that although there are some differences between observational datas of two measurement modes,in which the maximum average surface wind direction and speed,the average maximum temperature of the ground and the average minimum surface humidity have large different,they are still within the allowable range of accuracy.In addition to the difference caused by instrument performance and operational principle,the changes of observation environment and special weather phenomenon are also important reasons for the difference.
分 类 号:P415[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28