论整体经济利益与经济法主体  

On the Macroeconomic Benefit and the Subject of Economic Jurisprudence

作　　者：刘少军[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京102249

出　　处：《晋阳学刊》2016年第2期120-129,共10页Academic Journal of Jinyang

摘　　要：经济法理论是伴随着争论成长的,之所以存在这些争论主要有4个原因:一是法学理论本身就存在问题,许多理论误解没有厘清;二是法学研究缺少法哲学基础,没有把价值追求作为法学的灵魂和学科独立的前提;三是理论应主要来源于对实践的总结,许多重要的经济法现象并没有引起学者们的关注;四是经济法的实践还不够充分,要建立完善的经济法理论体系还需要充分发挥理性思维。作者认为,法学分类的标准只应有两个:一是独立的价值追求,二是体现这一追求的法律规范;纯粹研究法律部门的分类基本上不具有法学意义。经济法的价值追求是整体经济利益,经济法的核心主体应是经济监管主体,这已为世界各国的法律实践所证实,我国经济监管主体的独立性正在逐步形成。Economic Jurisprudence is growing accompanied with arguments. The reason for these arguments are four main reasons as follows： Firstly, there are problems in the theory of law, many theoretical misunderstandins are not clarified; Secondly, there is a lack of jurisprudence base in law research, the legal value is not treated as the soul and the precondition of subject classification; Third, the main sources of the theory are the practice summaries, many phenomena of economic law have not caused enough attention; Fourth, the practice of economic law is not enough,to establish the perfect theory system of economic jurisprudence needs to give full play to the rational thinking. I think that the classification standards of jurisprudence should have only two： the first is independent legal value, the second is legal norms reflected this value; the taxonomy of law does not have jurisprudence significance basically. The value of economic jurisprudence is macroeconomic benefit; the core subject of economic jurisprudence is the economic regulatory body. This has been confirmed by the legal practice of all countries in the world. The independence of economic regulatory body of our country is gradually formed.

关 键 词：法的价值追求 整体经济利益 经济法学科 第四种权力 经济监管机构 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]