检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫涛[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学哲学院,天津300350
出 处:《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第2期144-148,共5页Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
摘 要:分析了戴维·米勒关于全球正义、民族责任及确立全球正义底限等问题的观点。全球正义是一种世界正义,因为这个世界是由各具独特文化的诸多民族国家组成的,这些民族国家都能合理地要求相当程度的政治自主,但现实中全球政府的缺失要求必须从温和的角度和现实主义态度的视角考虑和理解全球正义;这种全球正义不是强式世界主义的,但仍存在着跨越国家和民族界限的正义义务,这种义务虽然不能完全弥合正义的鸿沟,但恰恰能缩小这一鸿沟,最终世界上的穷人会有更多的希望,而且他们的权利也会得到更好的保障。This paper analyzes David Miller's views on global justice,national responsibility and the establishment of global justice bottom line and other issues. Global justice is a world of justice,because the world is made up many nation States with its own unique culture. The nation States can reasonably require a certain degree of political autonomy. But in reality,the absence of global government requires us must consider and understand global justice from a moderate and realistic perspective. The global justice is not a strong cosmopolitan but there are still justice obligations across State and national boundaries. This responsibility can not completely bridge the justice gap but can narrow the gap. In the end,the poor people in the world will have more hopes,and their rights will be better protected.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222