评“语法构式、修辞构式”二分法  

Is It Grammatical or Rhetorical Construction?——Random Comments Upon the Dichotomy of Grammatical Vs Rhetorical Construction

作　　者：侯国金[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学外国语学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第1期119-128,共10页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(12BYY017);教育部社会科学基金项目(12XJA740008);华侨大学研究生课程建设教学改革资助项目(14YJG08)

摘　　要：刘大为《从语法构式到修辞构式》一文论述了"语法构式、修辞构式"的二分以及(不)可推导性标准。其构式"连续体"思想和"将语法学和修辞学整合为一个学科统一体"思想具有积极意义,但(不)可推导性不适合作为标准。刘文提出修辞构式源于"修辞"的泛化。其"修辞构式"实际上是语法构式的修辞性、浮现性或有标记性,可用"语法构式的标记性"和"狭义修辞构式"来代替"修辞构式"。This makes a review of and comment upon Liu Dawei（ 2010） which expounds the dichotomy of grammatical construction（ GC） VS rhetorical construction（ RC）,plus the distinguishing criterion of ± calculability. It is maintained that on the one hand Liu＇s idea of constructional continuum and his efforts of ‘integrating the unity of grammar and rhetoric＇are valuable,and on the other hand ± calculability does not serve well as a criterion,and RC as he sees is no more than the rhetoricalness,emergentness（ ad hoc） or markedness of GC. Liu＇s RC occurs due to the generalization of the term rhetoric. To substitute his RC,I suggest ‘markedness of GC＇ and ‘narrow-sense RC＇.

关 键 词：语法构式 修辞构式 (不)可推导性 连续体 浮现用法 

分 类 号：H314[语言文字—英语]