当代西方文论中“强制阐释”的积弊反思  

Reflection on Long-time Malpractices in "Compulsory Interpretation" in Western Literary Theory

作　　者：高岩[1] 

机构地区：[1]渤海大学外国语学院,辽宁锦州121013

出　　处：《渤海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第3期85-90,共6页Journal of Bohai University:Philosophy & Social Science Edition

基　　金：辽宁省社会科学规划基金重点项目"当代西方文论中"强制阐释"的积弊反思"(项目编号:L15AWW002)

摘　　要："强制阐释论"是张江教授新近针对当代西方文论提出的一种理论。在当代西方文论的影响下中国文论虽然取得了一定的成果,但也存在很多缺陷。如何对待中国文论同当代西方文论的关系,是目前中国文论界讨论的热点话题。通过对西方文论中的"强制阐释"做批判性研究,从其话语特征包括场外征用和主观预设等方面入手,借鉴各种批评理论之长,吸收了各种批评理论的经验,扩充和发展了本体阐释的优势。探讨"强制阐释"对中国文论建设的影响。借鉴各种批评理论的特色,形成对强制阐释的有效批评方法,从整体上把握"强制阐释"在中国文论建设中的积极之处和理性地去除其弊端。The 'Theory of Compulsory Interpretation' was put forward by Prof. ZHANG Jiang in contrast to the contemporary Western literary theories. For the defections existing in Chinese literary theory,there arises a hot discussion on the relationship between the Western literary theories and the Chinese ones.On the basis of 'Compulsory Interpretation' in Western literary theory, some critical comments have been made to it from several aspects, hence the advantages of ontological interpretation. The advantages and disadvantages of compulsory interpretation are objectively analyzed by discussing its influence on Chinese literary theory and by using various effective critical approaches.

关 键 词：当代西方文论 强制阐释 中国文论重建 

分 类 号：I109[文学—世界文学]