检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省徐州市中心医院临床药学部,徐州221009
出 处:《药学与临床研究》2016年第2期185-187,共3页Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
基 金:徐州市科技计划项目(XZZDY1403)
摘 要:目的:通过比较临床药师对癌痛患者药学干预前后认知行为的变化,为实施癌痛管理提供依据。方法:采用自行设计的癌痛认知的调查问卷,对徐州市某三甲医院132例癌痛患者进行调查,临床药师对癌痛患者进行认知行为的药学干预,评价干预前后的镇痛效果。采用SPSS13.0软件进行数据的统计分析。结果:最终选取107位癌痛患者为研究对象。开展药学服务后受访患者对癌痛认知的正确率从67.4%上升到88.7%,受访患者的行为正确率从66.0%上升到94.0%,癌痛控制效果显著,与开展药学干预前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床药师对癌痛患者进行认知行为教育后癌痛控制程度显著改善。Objective: To provide the basis for effectively implementing the management of cancer pain by comparing changes of cognitive behavior of patients with cancer pain before and after pharmaceutical intervention from clinical pharmacists. Methods: Along with investigating 132 patients with cancer pain from a hospital in Xuzhou using a questionnaire designed by our own, clinical pharmacists performed pharmaceutical intervention on cognitive behavior and evaluate the analgesic effect before and after the intervention. The SPSS13.0 statistical software was used for data analysis with the inspection level at α =0.05(double side). Results: Finally, 107 patients were viable as research objects. The accuracy rate of pain cognition from respondents before and after pharmaceutical intervention rose from 67.4% to 88.7%, the participants' behavior accuracy rate increased from 66.0% to 94.0%, which showed a remarkable pain control effect(P<0.05). Conclusion: With clinical pharmacists participating in clinical work and educating patients with pain about cognitive behavior, the degree of pain control can be improved significantly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.192.32