检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:乔金杰[1,2] 穆月英[1] 赵旭强[3] 郑继兴[2] 齐秀辉[2]
机构地区:[1]中国农业大学经济管理学院,北京100083 [2]齐齐哈尔大学经济与管理学院,齐齐哈尔161005 [3]山西省社会科学院经济研究所,太原030006
出 处:《干旱区资源与环境》2016年第4期46-50,共5页Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基 金:高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20120008110032);公益性行业科研专项(201103001);北京市果类蔬菜产业创新团队项目;黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目扶持共建项目(13E082);黑龙江省社科规划青年项目(13C063)资助
摘 要:基于冯·诺依曼效用函数和政策干预理论,通过引入补贴和技术风险对技术采用模型进行了修正,从理论上分析了政府补贴对技术采用的影响机理,并利用山西和河北两省调研数据,实证检验了政府补贴对低碳农业技术采用的干预效应。研究结果表明:1)该技术采用率偏低,只有17%;2)补贴政策对技术采用具有显著的促进作用,在考虑样本选择性偏误后,补贴的这种正向干预效应变大;3)技术风险对技术采用具有显著的阻碍作用;4)补贴分配具有一定的内生性,参加项目是补贴分配的制度"门槛",土地规模和土地产权是补贴分配的显著制约因素。Based on VHM utility functions and government intervention theory,we corrected the technology adoption model with the policy intervention and risk,and analyzed theoretically the impact system of the subsidy on the low carbon technology adoption. Then the intervention effect of the subsidy on the low carbon technology adoption was tested based on survey data in Shanxi and Hebei provinces. The results show as follows: firstly,the rate of the technology adoption was lower,only 17%; secondly,the subsidy had a significant positive effect on the low carbon technology adoption,and the positive effect of the subsidy was larger considering the sample selectivity bias; thirdly,the technology risk factors had a significant negative impact on technology adoption;fourthly,in process of subsidy allocation,participation in the project was the system " threshold",land areas and land rights were the significant constraints,therefore the subsidy allocation had a certain endogeneity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.132.49