给付行政之法律保留适用探讨  

Discussion on Applicable Legal Reservation about Benefits Administration

作　　者：杨东升[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]泰州学院人文学院,江苏泰州225300 [2]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2016年第1期66-71,共6页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：江苏省教育厅"青蓝工程"资助项目;泰州学院校级课题"民生权利司法救济制度研究"(TZXY2015YBKT002)

摘　　要：给付行政是否适用或何种范围上适用法律保留原则学术界仍然存在争论,其原因在于给付行政不是基于传统行政法学方法论所提出的法学概念。鉴于给付行政概念及其范畴的复杂性,给付行政是否适用法律保留,须结合以下多个要素考量:给付行政是否属于高权行政,是否基于公民主观公权利的给付,是否通过公法方式实施,是否处于紧急状态,是否存在对待给付,给付行政与侵害行政是否可分,部分给付行政不适用严格的法律保留,但仍受到行政法基本原则、最低限度的正当法律程序、基于生存权可诉性的制约。Benefits administration is arguing with applicable law retention policy. The reason is that concept of the executive’s pay raising is not based on traditional administrative law methodology. Given scope of the concept of benefits administration is complex. Whether it applies to legal reserves needs to consider multiple elements as follows： Whether benefits administration belongs to high administrative rights and public subjective rights of citizens is by way of public law implemented,under the state of emergency,and the coexistence of interference administration.Although some benefits administration does not apply to strict legal reservation,it is subject to the constraints of the basic principles of administrative law,the low limit due process and justifiability of the right to life.

关 键 词：给付行政 法律保留 福利行政 社会法治 

分 类 号：D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]