检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Mohammad Nadeem Ahmed 单玉喜[1] 周演铃[2]
机构地区:[1]苏州大学附属第二医院泌尿外科,江苏省215004 [2]苏州大学附属第二医院手术室,江苏省215004
出 处:《江苏医药》2016年第6期656-657,共2页Jiangsu Medical Journal
基 金:苏州市科技发展计划指导项目(SYSD2012086)
摘 要:目的总结经尿道2-μm激光治疗小体积良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效。方法小体积BPH患者64例,随机均分为经尿道2-μm激光组与经尿道前列腺汽化电切术(TURP)组,比较两组临床疗效和并发症发生情况。结果治疗后,2-μm激光组患者的国际前列腺症状评分、最大尿流率和残余尿量均优于TURP组(P<0.05)。2-μm激光组的并发症发生率为6.25%,低于TURP组的21.88%(P<0.05)。结论与TURP比较,2-μm激光治疗小体积BPH疗效较好,并发症较少。Objective To summarize the clinical efficacy of transurethral 2-μm laser in treating small volume benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods Sixty-four patients with small volume BPH were randomly assigned into two groups of A(treated with 2-μm laser,32cases)and B(treated with transurethral resection of the prostate,32 cases).Clinical efficacy and complications were compared.Results The improvements of international prostate symptom score,maximum urinary flow rate and residual urine volume were better in group A than those in group B(P〈0.05).The incidence of complications was lower in group A than that in group B(6.25% vs.21.88%)(P〈0.05).Conclusion Compared to transurethral resection of the prostate,2-μm laser is better in clinical efficacy and has less complications in treating small volume BPH.
关 键 词:良性前列腺增生 经尿道前列腺汽化电切术 2-μm激光
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117