机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第二医院药学部,石家庄050000 [2]河北医科大学第二医院制剂科,石家庄050000
出 处:《中国药房》2016年第10期1363-1366,共4页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:建立大鼠血浆中芍药苷和连翘苷浓度测定的方法,并用于大鼠ig前列安颗粒后的药动学研究。方法:采取液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS/MS)法。色谱柱为Waters C18;流动相为乙腈(A)-2 mmol/L乙酸铵溶液(含0.05%甲酸)(B)(0~9 min:15%A→50%A;9~11 min:50%A→90%A;11~17 min:90%A;17~19 min:90%A→15%A;19~20 min:15%A);流速为0.6 ml/min;柱温为35℃;进样量为20μl;定量离子对为芍药苷m/z 525.2→m/z 449.0,连翘苷m/z 552.3→m/z 355.3。7只雄性SD大鼠ig前列安颗粒药液1 g(生药)/kg后0.25、0.5、0.75、1、1.5、2、3、4、6、8、10、12、24 h眼内眦取血0.5 ml测定血药浓度,采用DAS 2.1.1药动学软件计算药动学参数。结果:芍药苷、连翘苷检测质量浓度线性范围分别为5.0~2 500.0μg/L(r=0.997 9)、2.0~2 000.0μg/L(r=0.998 2);精密度试验的RSD均小于5.5%(n=5);方法回收率分别为96.0%~104.0%、92.0%~107.0%,提取回收率分别为71.4%~83.5%、81.5%~92.3%;稳定性试验的RSD均小于5.0%(n=3)。芍药苷、连翘苷在大鼠体内的t1/2分别为(2.206±0.631)、(1.355±0.317)h,cmax分别为(1 504.069±620.885)、(79.043±15.568)μg/L,tmax分别为(1.000±0.250)、(1.214±0.267)h,AUC0-24 h分别为(4 897.645±2 207.577)、(263.475±54.795)μg·h/L,CL分别为(5.025±2.773)、(76.253±13.986)L/(h·kg)。结论:该方法灵敏度高、专属性强、操作简便、准确可靠,可应用于芍药苷、连翘苷在大鼠体内的药动学特征研究。OBJECTIVE:To establish a method for determining the plasma concentration of paeoniflorin and phillyrin and pharmacokinetic study before and after intragastric administration of Qianliean granules. METHODS:LC-MS/MS method was adopted.The column was Waters C18 with mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile(A)-2 mmol/L ammonium acetate(containing 0.05% formic acid)(B)(0-9 min:15% A→50% A;9-11 min:50% A→90% A;11-17 min:90% A;17-19 min:90% A→15% A;19-20 min:15%A),at the flow rate of 0.6 ml/min;column temperature was 35 ℃ and the volume was 20 μl;quantitative ions were paeoniflorin m/z 525.2 → m/z 449.0,phillyrin m/z 552.3 → m/z 355.3. 7 SD male rats were docked to collect blood 0.5 ml from angular vein0.25,0.5,0.75,1,1.5,2,3,4,6,8,10,12,24 h after administration Qianliean granule solution 1 g(medicinal materials)/kg to determine the blood concentration of drugs. DAS 2.1.1 software was employed to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS:The linear range of paeoniflorin and phillyri were 5.0-2 500.0 μg/L(r=0.997 9)and 2.0-2 000.0 μg/L(r=0.998 2),respectively;RSD of precision test was less than 5.5%(n=5);the method recovery were 96.0%-104.0% and 92.0%-107.0%,the extration recovery were 71.4%-83.5% and 81.5%-92.3% and RSD of stability test was less than 5.0%(n=3). The pharmacokinetic parameters of paeoniflorin and phillyrin were as follows as t1/2of(2.206±0.631)and(1.355±0.317)h;cmaxof(1 504.069±620.885)and(79.043±15.568)μg/L;tmaxof(1.000 ± 0.250)and(1.214 ± 0.267)h;AUC0-24 hof(4 897.645 ± 2 207.577)and(263.475±54.795)μg·h/L;CL of(5.025±2.773)and(76.253±13.986)L/(h·kg). CONCLUSIONS:The method is highly sensitive,exclusive,simple,accurate and reliable,and can be applied to study the pharmacokinetic characteristics of paeoniflorin and phillyrin in rats in vivo.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...