违约可得利益损失赔偿的确定标准  

Standard for the Determination of Compensation for the Loss of Profit by Breach of Contract

作　　者：郝丽燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]济南大学政法学院

出　　处：《环球法律评论》2016年第2期48-66,共19页Global Law Review

摘　　要：我国《合同法》第113条规定违约责任中可得利益的赔偿额度以"预见或应当预见"为界限,但是司法裁判中经常援用"确定性规则"对可得利益损失赔偿不予支持。"可预见性规则"是在因果关系之外的附加要件,其目的是为了限制可得利益损失赔偿,避免违约方承担过分的赔偿责任,而"确定性"则是诉讼中判断是否存在可得利益时的证明标准问题。英美法及大陆法在可得利益证明标准方面现阶段通常采"极大可能性"理论。"可预见性"和"极大可能性"涉及的是可得利益的不同方面,二者同时满足才能使违约可得利益损失得到赔偿。另外,在确定可得利益的数额时可以选择具体计算方法或抽象计算方法,抽象计算方法一般仅适用于商业领域。The loss of profit by breach of contract provided for in Article 113 of the Chinese Contract Law takes the ＂foreseen or foreseeable＂ as its standard of determination. However, the ＂certainty＂ rule is often applied in judicial practice to deny claims of loss of prof- it by breach of contract. ＂Foreseeability＂ is an element in the determination of compensation for the loss of profit in addition to causality, the purpose of which is to limit the compensation for the loss of profit in the interests of the delinquent party, whereas ＂certainty＂ is the standard of proof used for the determination of loss of profit. Currently both the Anglo-American law and the Continental law adopt the ＂very likely＂ doctrine as their standard of proof. ＂ Foreseeability＂ and ＂very likely＂ are not in an either-or relationship, but can co-exist with each other as the two necessary conditions of the compensation for the loss of profit. In determining the amount of loss of profit, both concrete calculation methods and abstract calculation methods can be used.

关 键 词：可得利益 可预见性确定性 具体计算抽象计算 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]