谁来保护法官的履职权益——民事法官自由裁量权与案件责任的冲突与协调  

Who Will Protect the Judge and Interests——Civil Judges Discretion and Responsibility of Conflict and Coordination

作　　者：向志勇[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学经济法学院,重庆401120 [2]重庆市大渡口区人民法院,重庆400080

出　　处：《湖北经济学院学报》2016年第2期112-117,共6页Journal of Hubei University of Economics

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(12CFX001)

摘　　要：民事法律规范及民事审判的特点给民事法官处理案件时留下了更多自由裁量的空间,民事审判自由裁量权的发挥能够克服法律滞后并提升审判效率,但也容易造成民事法官滥用自由裁量权,导致司法腐败。案件责任追究机制在规制民事法官滥用自由裁量权的行为方面发挥了一定作用,但在实践操作中往往偏离正常的轨道,导致民事法官无端被追究案件责任,严重挫伤了民事法官的工作积极性。为了解决民事法官后顾之忧,保障民事审判自由裁量权功能的正常发挥,我们要在明确错案标准及范围的前提下,界定正当行使自由裁量权下案件责任豁免的情形,并以立法形式赋予法官自由裁量限度内的豁免权,严格限定法官案件责任追究启动条件。The characteristics of the civil law and the civil trial for civil judges handle cases left more room for discretion, the play of civil judicial discretion can overcome legal lag and improve judicial efficiency, but also easy to cause the civil judges abuse of discretion, judicial corruption. In the regulation of civil case responsibility mechanism the abuse of discretion by the judge has played a certain role, but in practice often deviate from normal orbit, subject to a civil case responsibility gratuitous were investigated, a judge seriously impaired the work enthusiasm of the civil judge. Civil judges in order to solve the trouble back at home, the protection of the normal play of the function of civil judicial discretion, we are clearly wrong case scope and standards under the premise of defining the legitimate exercise of discretion under the case of liability ex- emption, and in the form of legislation to give judges discretion within the limit of immunity, strictly limit the judge case re- sponsibility start conditions.

关 键 词：民事审判 自由裁量 责任豁免 法官 

分 类 号：D916.2[政治法律—法学]