检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋兰合[1] 贾瑞宝 宋武昌 潘章斌 由阳[1] 李宗来[1]
机构地区:[1]中国城市规划设计研究院,北京100037 [2]山东省城市供排水水质监测中心,山东济南250001
出 处:《中国给水排水》2016年第7期53-57,共5页China Water & Wastewater
基 金:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2009ZX07419002)
摘 要:为比较常规工艺、臭氧—生物活性炭工艺和膜处理工艺的净水效果,进行了有关重金属、农药和典型有机物的加标净水中试研究。结果表明,臭氧—生物活性炭工艺对有机物、农药、氨氮和嗅味物质的去除效果明显高于其他两种工艺;超滤膜对浊度、微生物和藻类的去除能力明显高于其他两种工艺;三种工艺对氯化物、硫酸盐、硝酸盐、溶解性总固体、氟化物和总硬度等指标均无明显去除效果。In order to compare the water treatment efficiency of conventional process, ozone/biological activated carbon process and membrane treatment process, the pilot tests on heavy mental, pesticides and typical organic compounds were conducted. The results showed that the removal efficiency of organic compounds, pesticides, ammonia nitrogen and odorous compounds by ozone/biological activated carbon process was significantly higher than that by the other two kinds of processes. The removal efficiency of turbidity, bacteria and algae by ultrafiltration was significantly higher than that by the other two kinds of processes. The removal efficiencies of chloride, sulfate, nitrate, total soluble solid, fluoride and total hardness by the three kinds of processes were not obvious.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.16