检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张燕[1]
出 处:《廉政文化研究》2016年第1期50-54,共5页Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
基 金:南通大学人文社会科学基金项目(13W06)
摘 要:少数学术期刊编辑在工作中存在的行为失范现象,在一定程度上助长了学术不端风气的蔓延,主要包括篡改、编造专家意见,随意更改、增加作者署名,违规操作造成作者被"一稿多发",通过增减参考文献进行恶意竞争等。这不仅有碍期刊的良性发展,也扰乱了学术秩序,破坏了学术的公平。作为学术论文质量"守门员"的期刊编辑应恪守编辑职业道德规范,在编辑出版过程中不造假、不纵假;建立健全监督管理机制,使编辑在各个工作环节中有章可循、有据可依,同时要加大社会监督的力度,共同守望学术良知,净化社会风气。There can be found some unruly behaviors in the editorial work of a few periodicals, which contribute to a certain degree to academic misconducts. These include interpolations, compilation of expert opinions, varying or adding author names,operations against rules leading to falsified "multi-submissions"of the author, vicious competitions through adding or taking away references, and the like. This impedes the healthy development of periodicals, violates academic regulations and damages academic fairness. As"goalkeepers"guaranteeing quality of academic papers, editors should strictly abide by their professional ethics and rid themselves of such behaviors as producing or tolerating fake information. Supervising and managing mechanisms should be built up or strengthened so that rules can be found and abided by in every stage of editorial work, and at the same time, societal supervision should be enhanced for a well-kept academic conscience and a purified social mode.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.158.72