China Pilot Free Trade Zones Call Reform of Arbitrator Liability  

作　　者：李晓郛 

机构地区：[1]School of Law, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

出　　处：《Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong university(Science)》2016年第2期220-224,共5页上海交通大学学报（英文版）

基　　金：The Special Research Fund for the National Social Science Foundation of China(No.14ZDC016)

摘　　要：Arbitration is vital for China Pilot Free Trade Zones(PFTZs). Though both of the Criminal Law and the Arbitration Law have clauses on liability of arbitrator, the ambiguity is risky for foreign arbitrators. There are three main theories on immunity of arbitrator in the world while China does not choose any one or set up a new one. For PFTZs' development, it is time to establish details on liability of arbitrator and arbitrator immunity.Arbitration is vital for China Pilot Free Trade Zones（PFTZs）. Though both of the Criminal Law and the Arbitration Law have clauses on liability of arbitrator, the ambiguity is risky for foreign arbitrators. There are three main theories on immunity of arbitrator in the world while China does not choose any one or set up a new one. For PFTZs＇ development, it is time to establish details on liability of arbitrator and arbitrator immunity.

关 键 词：LIABILITY ARBITRATION PILOT Free Trade Zones(PFTZs) 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]