检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]泸州医学院附属医院
出 处:《按摩与康复医学》2016年第8期54-55,共2页Chinese Manipulation and Rehabilitation Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察临床康复护理用于脊髓损伤痉挛型神经源性膀胱的效果。方法:选择2013年12月~2014年12月到我院接受治疗的脊髓损伤痉挛型神经源性膀胱患者60例,分成观察组与对照组,对照组采用常规临床护理,观察组采用临床康复护理给予干预,对比两组护理效果。结果:观察组残余尿量、平均排尿次数显著少于对照组(P〈0.05):而膀胱容量、最大排尿量显著高于对照组(P〈0.05);观察组总有效率显著高于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论:脊髓损伤痉挛型神经源性膀胱患者采用临床康复护理进行干预,可获得明显的护理效果,改善患者临床指标,加快患者疾病康复速度,值得临床推广应用。Objective: To observe the application effect of Clinical rehabilitation care in spastic neurogenic bladder caused by spinal cord injury. Methods: Selected 60 cases of patients with spastic neurogenic bladder caused by spinal cord injury who accepted treatment in our hospital from Dec 2013 to Dec 2014 and divided into observation group and control group, the control group accepted conventional care, while observation group intervened by clinical rehabilitation care, compared the effect of two groups. Results: The residual urine and average micturition frequency of observation group were significantly less than those of control group (P〈0.05), while bladder capacity and maximum voided volume were significantly higher than those of control group (P〈0.05); the overall response rate of observation was significantly higher than that of control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Patients with spastic neurogenic bladder caused by spinal cord injury intervened by clinical rehabilitation care can achieve obvious effect, which can improve the clinical indexes and rehabilitation speed, deserves clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200