死刑存废之争的历史演变与未来进路  

The Historical Evolution and Future Approaches of the Death Penalty Debate

作　　者：陈凌剑[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《中国石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第2期51-56,共6页Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Social Sciences)

摘　　要：死刑改革无疑是目前司法改革的重点。中国关于死刑的存废之争经历了哲学层面、法哲学和法社会学层面的争论后,最终回归刑法学本身,目前在"限制"死刑的范围内达成共识。限制死刑论希冀通过借助"少杀""慎杀"的刑事政策最大限度缩小死刑的适用范围,同时逐步实现废除死刑。而未来存废双方在涉及严重腐败犯罪、严重暴力犯罪以及民意等方面将继续存在不可避免的争论。It is undoubted that the death penalty reform has become the focus of the current judicial reform. In China, the dispute about the existence and abolition of the death penalty has experienced the controversy on the level of philosophy, law philosophy and so-ciology, and finally returned to the perspective of the criminal law itself. Now, both sides reach a consensus in the scope of limited death penalty. Scholars holding to limiting the death penalty hope to minimize the scope of application of the death penalty by using the criminal policy of "less kill" and "cautious kill", and to abolish death penalty gradually. In the future, death penalty in serious corruption, serious violence crime and public opinion, will cause sustained and inevitable controversy between the two sides.

关 键 词：死刑限制论 民意 “少杀" “慎杀" 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]