岩溶区地下水质量评价方法的对比分析  

Comparative analysis on evaluation method for karst groundwater quality

作　　者：王春懿[1,2] 梁川[1,2] 景楠[1,2] 赵鹏[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学水利水电学院,成都610065 [2]水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,成都610065

出　　处：《黑龙江大学工程学报》2016年第1期1-6,共6页Journal of Engineering of Heilongjiang University

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(41271045)

摘　　要：岩溶区地下水质量评价对该地区人类生存环境及经济的可持续发展有着重要意义,但评价方法多样。为更好地了解单因子指数评价法、F值评分法和模糊综合评价法3种应用较广泛的方法在岩溶地下水质量评价的应用,分别运用上述方法对广西河池市4个水厂的地下水水源进行水质综合评价,并对评价结果进行对比分析。结果表明:研究区内地下水水质良好;单因子指数评价法片面反映水质整体情况;F值评分法和模糊综合评价法的评价结果更为准确和客观,后者计算量更大。综上可知,F值评分法和模糊综合评价法优于单因子指数评价法。Karst groundwater quality evaluation is important to the sustainable development of human survival environment and the region economy,but the methods are diversiform,such as the single factor index method,the F value method and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method have been widely used. In order to better understand the application of three methods in karst groundwater quality evaluation,three methods are used to evaluate and analyze the water quality of groundwater source of four water plants in Hechi of Guangxi. The results showed that the water quality is good,the single factor index method cannot reflect the overall water quality,the results of the F value method and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method are more accurate and objective except a large amount of calculation. In conclusion,the F value method and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method were superior to the single factor index method.

关 键 词：岩溶地下水 水质评价方法 对比分析 广西河池 

分 类 号：P641.8[天文地球—地质矿产勘探] X824[天文地球—地质学]