急性心肌梗死患者的抢救护理干预措施及效果分析  

Rescue nursing intervention measures and effect analysis on acute myocardial infarction patients

作　　者：郭爱清[1] 袁小菊[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东省聊城市人民医院急诊科,252000

出　　处：《国际护理学杂志》2016年第6期785-788,共4页international journal of nursing

摘　　要：目的探讨急性心肌梗死的抢救护理的有效方法，并分析其效果。方法选取90例实施急救护理路径进行抢救护理的急性心肌梗死的患者为观察组，选取同期90例采用常规抢救护理的急性心肌梗死的患者为对照组，比较两组的抢救效率、抢救效果及健康知识的掌握情况。结果观察组的分诊评估时间、心电图时间、建立静脉通道时间、静脉用药时间、疼痛缓解时间、抢救时间均短于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。观察组的死亡率、复发率低于对照组，抢救成功率、疼痛缓解时间、卧床时间、住院时间度短于对照组，并发症少于对照组，健康知识知晓率高于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论急救护理路径能够提高急性心肌梗死的抢救效率和抢救效果，改善患者预后。Objective To explore the effective method of emergency nursing on acute myocardial infarction, and analyze the effect of the treatment. Methods A total of 90 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were adopt- ed emergency nursing pathway were selected as the observation group, and another 90 patients who were adopted routine rescue nursing were selected as the control group. Results The evaluation time, the ECG time, the establishment time of the venous channel, the intravenous medication time, the pain relief time and the rescue time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group, the differences were statistically significant （P〈0. 05 ） . The mortal- ity rate and recurrence rate of the observation group were lower than those of the control group ; the rescue success rate, pain relief time, bed time and length of hospital stay were shorter than those of the control group ; the complications of the observation group was less than that of the control group ; the awareness rate of health knowledge of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant （ P〈0. 05 ） . Conclusions Emergency nursing pathway can improve the efficiency and the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction patients.

关 键 词：急性心肌梗死 抢救 护理干预 

分 类 号：R542.22[医药卫生—心血管疾病]