噻奈普汀与帕罗西汀对抑郁症患者疗效和安全性的系统评价  被引量:10

Systematic review of tianeptine versus paroxetine in treatment for depression

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:杜扬[1] 杜彪[2] 张杰[3] 谢星星 

机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学临床医学1系,重庆400016 [2]重庆三峡中心医院药学部,重庆404000 [3]川北医学院药学院,四川南充637000 [4]四川医科大学药学院,四川泸州646000

出  处:《中国临床药理学杂志》2016年第7期655-656,659,共3页The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

基  金:重庆市社会事业与民生保障专项基金资助项目(CSTC;2015shmszx120073);万州区科技计划基金资助项目(201403055)

摘  要:目的系统评价噻奈普汀与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性。方法计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、维普全文数据库、万方数据库、Pub Med、Medline、Em Base中关于噻奈普汀与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的随机对照临床试验(RCT),用Cochrane系统评价的方法进行评价,用Rev Man5.0统计软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入8项研究,共936例患者。Meta分析结果显示,噻奈普汀组患者显效率、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分与帕罗西汀组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不良反应发生率方面,2组差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论噻奈普汀与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症疗效相当,不良反应少。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tianeptine and paroxetine in the treatment of depression. Methods Retrieved from CNKI,VIP,Wanfang database,Pub Med,Medline and Em Base,randomized controlled trial( RCTs) about tianeptine or paroxetine in treatment of depression were collected and evaluated by Cochrane systematic review. Meta- analysis was carried out by Rev Man 5. 0 software.Results Eight studies were included,involving 936 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference on the rates of marked improvement and Hamilton depression scale( HAMD) between tianeptine and paroxetine( P〉0. 05). The incidence of adverse drug reactions in both groups had significant difference( P〈0. 01).Conclusion Tianeptine is as effective as and safer than paroxetine in the treatment of depression.

关 键 词:噻奈普汀 帕罗西汀 抑郁症 系统评价 

分 类 号:R971.43[医药卫生—药品]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象