检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《成都体育学院学报》2016年第2期62-68,共7页Journal of Chengdu Sport University
基 金:山西省高校哲学社会科学研究项目(2012239)
摘 要:武术概念争议的实质是武术概念如何获得共识的问题,而概念对象的明晰性与一致性是概念公共性的前提条件。文章分析了对象对于概念的重要性,并从概念的外延、内涵、语词与对象的关系、对象的历时性、对象的共时性、对象的集体规范六方面对概念对象的明晰性提出质疑,进一步运用逻辑分析法论证了对象模糊的根源,认为:拳种与拳种运动形式关系的混淆、拳种与拳种运动形式形成的运动关系的混淆、拳种与拳种运动形式形成的运动的价值关系的混淆、拳种之前的武术与拳种及拳种之后的武术的同质性割裂,是武术概念对象失范的逻辑根源。武术概念争议因对象失范而陷入无法解决的困局。The nature of disputes over the concept of Wushu is how to reach a consensus and the object that the concept refers to is clear and consistent is the precondition for the concept to be accepted universally. This paper analyzes why the object is important to the definition of Wushu,and questions whether the object that the concept refers to is clear with reference to the connotation and denotation of concept,relationship between words and objects,diachronicity,synchronicity,and collective criteria of object. The paper further analyzes the reasons why the object that the concept of Wushu refers to is fuzzy and attributes the fuzziness to the confusion of boxing types and their forms,of boxing types and the relationship of their forms,of boxing types and the values of their forms as well as the dehomogenization of Wushu activities before and after the boxing types occurred.The misconception of the object in the concept of Wushu is the logical outcome of all these confusions,and this puts the disputes over the concept of Wushu in an everlasting dilemma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112