英国军队援塞抗埃行动及与我军对比分析  

The Ebola-countering Operations in Sierra Leone Between UK and China and their implications: a comparative analysis

作　　者：于双平[1,2] 董罡[1] 毛军文[2] 牟劲松[3] 詹宁波[3] 贺祯[1] 

机构地区：[1]军事医学科学院卫生勤务与医学情报研究所,北京100850 [2]军事医学科学院科技部,北京100850 [3]解放军302医院,北京100039

出　　处：《军事医学》2016年第3期190-194,共5页Military Medical Sciences

基　　金：全军医学科技“十二五”重点项目(BWS11L068)

摘　　要：文章介绍了英国军队在2014年援助塞拉利昂抗击埃博拉疫情(援塞抗埃)行动中,服从于国家战略,突出国际主导地位;全方位立体投送,力量覆盖范围广泛;预设自我保障标准,兼顾国际协作伙伴;实施基地化训练,支援地方和国际机构等做法。对比分析了我军援塞抗埃行动与英军在任务定位、组织指挥、力量抽组、培训及投送、展开作业、自我保障、国际行动经验、援助效果等方面的异同,提出了完善组织指挥架构,建立健全配套制度体系;发展常备卫勤力量,开展基地化训练;深化软硬件建设研究,建立标准作业流程;建设国防医学战略智库,提高决策支持力度等启示和思考。The UK Ebola-countering Operation in Sierra Leone from September 2014 to November 2015 called Operation Gritrock and its countermeasures were briefly introduced,such as the national strategy,aero-maritime deployment,self medical support,base-oriented training and international cooperation. A comparative analysis was made of operations of the same type between the UK and China in terms of mission-orientation,command and control,deployment timeline,past experience,deployment routes,logistics and assistance effects. Four implications for China＇s military function construction in future international disaster relief operations were also summarized at the strategic,operational and tactical levels.

关 键 词：英国军队 埃博拉病毒 塞拉利昂 粗砂岩行动 派兵模式 国际合作 军事医学 

分 类 号：R82[医药卫生—临床医学]