检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Paul Boaheng
机构地区:[1]Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, USA
出 处:《Cultural and Religious Studies》2016年第3期185-193,共9页文化与宗教研究(英文版)
摘 要:The paper critically examines and refutes some of the standard arguments against Pascal's Wager, particularly, the "Many Gods Objection". The paper argues that Pascal's philosophical and theological opponents proceed far too quickly in dismissing his argument as implausible. Their determined attempts to tear down Pascal's Wager have caused them to miss its power and force. While the Wager may not be sound for today's multi culturally sophisticated audience, the Wager is quite cogent relative to Pascal's time, when theism and agnosticism were the only genuine possibilities. Thus, the paper concludes that Pascal's Wager is less vulnerable than most detractors seem to think.
关 键 词:Pascal's Wager Many-Gods Objection agnosticism SKEPTICISM
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117