超期追诉制度之反思与重构  

Reflection and Reconstruction of the System of Extending the Limitation of Prosecution

作　　者：陈国坤[1] 郑泽善[1] 

机构地区：[1]南开大学法学院,天津300350

出　　处：《南通大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第2期44-51,共8页Journal of Nantong University:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目(12FFX005)

摘　　要：我国刑法典第87条第4项之核准追诉制度实际上突破了追诉时效期限的原则规定,成为了事实上的特殊形式的超期追诉,但是该规定在适用标准上语义不甚明确,且在价值追求上与罪刑法定的基本理念背道而驰。更有甚者,如果准确把握了追诉时效延长和追诉时效中断之间的逻辑关系,还会发现该规定完全属于逻辑冗余。故而在梳理和完善超期追诉制度时,有必要准确把握追诉时效延长和追诉时效中断的实质内涵,并考虑对于特别例外形式的超期追诉应该赋予新的内容。The approval of prosecution system that ruled by Item 4 of Article 87 of our national Penal Code actually breaks through the principle rules of the limitation of prosecution, and becomes special format of extending the limitation of prosecution in reality, but this stipulation＇s semantics is equivocal in applicable standard and it runs in opposite direction with the basic concepts of the principle of legality in pursuit of value. Even if the logical relation between extension of the limitation of prosecution and interruption of the limitation of prosecution can be held accurately, this stipulation can be found it totally belongs to logical redundancy. Therefore, when collating and improving the extending of limitation of prosecution system, it is necessary to grasp the essential meaning of extension of limitation and interruption of limitation of prosecution accurately, and to consider endowing new contents for some special format of extending the limitation of prosecution.

关 键 词：追诉时效制度 超期追诉 时效延长 时效中断 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学] D924.1[政治法律—法学]