检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙峻峰[1] 熊东胜 高强[1] 郑维涛[1] 李康[1] 赵鑫[1] 康宁[1]
机构地区:[1]陕西省宝鸡市人民医院神经外科,宝鸡721000
出 处:《陕西医学杂志》2016年第4期463-465,共3页Shaanxi Medical Journal
基 金:陕西省宝鸡市卫生和计划生育局科研立项课题(2015-35)
摘 要:目的:探讨在慢性硬脑膜下血肿颅骨钻孔手术治疗中,改良T管引流相比传统硬脑膜下引流的优劣。方法:本次研究回顾分析了我院慢性硬脑膜下血肿行颅骨钻孔手术167例,分为2组,改良T管引流组96例,传统硬脑膜下引流组71例,统计比较了2组患者在术后残余积液及积气量、引流管保留时间、住院时间等情况,以评估治疗的效果。结果:改良T管引流较传统硬脑膜下引流对慢性硬脑膜下血肿的治疗,术后残余积液、积气量减少,留管时间由3~5d减少为2~3d,住院时间由12~14d减少为9~10d。结论:改良T管引流相比传统硬脑膜下引流术后残余积液、积气量小,有利于脑组织膨复,缩短引流管保留时间和住院时间,有更好的治疗效果。Objective: To compare modified T tube therapy with traditional skull drill-hole therapy in patients with chronic subdural hematoma. Methods: This study collected 167 cases from June 2008 to June 2015. The patients were divided into two groups. The remnant gas and liquid, drainage time, hospitalization time were com- pared between the two groups. Results: We found patients after modified T tube therapy had less remnant gas and liquid, drainage time decreased from 3-5 days to 2-3 days, hospitalization time decreased from 12-14 days to 9-10 days. Conclusion: Modified T tube therapy has less remnant gas and liquid than traditional skull drill hole therapy, better impact for brain restoration, decreased drainage time and hospitalization time. It has a better therapeutic effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.146.37.183