检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程波[1,2]
机构地区:[1]湘潭大学法学院 [2]"法治湖南建设与区域社会治理"协同创新中心
出 处:《北方法学》2016年第1期16-24,共9页Northern Legal Science
摘 要:法律权威需要寻找一些方法,以解决冲突并增进和协调人际和群体之间的关系。在这种考察中,社会心理学领域中围绕"程序正义(procedural Justice)"以实验方法展开的研究成果显示:程序和程序正义在解决纠纷方面存在巨大的潜能。无论从理论还是实证角度,程序正义的社会心理学及其在美国社会的冲突衡量与评价、冲突转型的治疗分析以及冲突解决策略的可行性认识等方面,均提供了丰富的理论资源,也有助于我们分析美国替代性纠纷解决方法 (ADR)适用的各种情境。The authority of law needs to find some measures to resolve disputes and to improve and co- ordinate relationship among people. In these observations, the procedural justice in the field of social psy- chology has indicated by experiments that procedures and procedural justice have great potential in dispute settlement. From both theoretical and positive perspective, the procedural justice in social psychology has provided abundant theoretical resourced in such aspects as conflicts balance and appraisal, therapeutic ju- risprudence for conflict transfer and feasibility conception of strategies for dispute settlement in American so- ciety, which will help us analyze various context for application of ADR in America.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.244.188