从南海九小岛事件看民国学者对南沙主权之论证  

Arguments for the Sovereignty over Nansha Islands by Scholars of the Republic of China about Territorial Disputes over the “Nine-Dash Line”

作　　者：郭渊[1] 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江大学历史文化旅游学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2016年第1期95-106,共12页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目"20世纪上半叶南海地缘形势与国民政府维护海洋权益研究"(项目编号15AGJ004);2015年国家海洋局国际合作研究项目"中国海上利益与南海/东海地名研究";中国海洋发展研究会重大项目"中国在推进海洋战略过程中的法制完善研究"(项目编号CAMAZDA201501)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：南海九小岛事件发生后,日、法两国进行了所谓的"主权"交涉与争论,分别以臆测的国际法某些说法为其侵略行为张目。民国学者吸收和借鉴中外法学家的学说,对国家领土取得原则进行论述,尤其是利用"先占"理论,剖析法、日所持理由或所谓法理依据的荒谬,并论证中国拥有南沙群岛主权是有充分根据的。但是由于对南沙属我的历史依据准备不足,以及对国际法某些理论的掌握程度不深,致使某些学者在研究问题时有一定理论与史实的偏差。Since the disputes over the ＂nine - dash line＂ of Nansha Islands occurred, Japan and France have respectively made their invasive claims according to their subjective understandings of interna- tional laws upon negotiations and argumentations. By absorbing and taking reference of jurist theories from both home and abroad, scholars of the Republic of China have made arguments on the territorial acquisition and the principle of preemption in particular. They have pointed out that the arguments held by France and Japan are ridiculous and groundless, while the sovereignty over Nansha Islands by China is rather sufficient. However, subject to insufficient historic proof and imperfection of understandings of international laws, some scholars have fallen into deviations over theory and historic facts.

关 键 词：九小岛 先占原则 主权 国际法 

分 类 号：DF93[政治法律—国际法学]