检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南开大学经济研究所
出 处:《经济学(季刊)》2016年第1期675-692,共18页China Economic Quarterly
摘 要:本文提出资本配置效应、市场接近效应、市场拥挤效应和所得税效应等转移支付政策的作用机理。分析表明,补贴欠发达地区企业经营利润的转移支付政策可以吸引发达地区的经济活动向欠发达地区转移,但并不能扩大欠发达地区的收入和市场规模。同时,尽管该政策可以实现福利水平区际公平的目标,但导致国民经济整体福利水平的损失。而区际贸易条件的改善不仅能减少转移支付导致的福利损失,而且能降低实现福利水平区际公平目标的补贴率要求。Four mechanisms are theoretically and empirically analyzed here:capital allocation effect,market-access effect,market crowding effect and income taxation effect,through which transfer payment policy affects the inter-regional disparities of economic development.When the central government provides enterprises in the poor region with subsidies proportional to their operating profits by the nation-wide income taxation,the gap of inter-regional industry shares would decrease,but the gap of inter-regional market scales which is an important index of regional economic development would increase.However,that kind of subsidy may contribute to a desired goal aiming to reduce the inter-regional inequality of individual welfare,although the total welfare would decrease.We also find that those improvements on terms of inter-regional trade not only reduce the degree of total welfare loss,but also relax the requirement on the optimal subsidy rate under which inter-regional equality on individual welfare should realize.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3