司法改革视角下“被告提交答辩状”的急迫性分析  

About the Urgency of Defendant's Submitting of Defense Besed on the Judicial Reform

作　　者：申孝萍 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆400031

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2016年第2期88-93,共6页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：随着民事审前程序改革的不断深入以及被告答辩制度、举证时限制度、证据交换制度、庭前会议制度的逐步确立,其制度设计在充实审理前准备程序的同时,也为纠纷及时有效、公平公正地解决奠定了坚实的基础。然而,根据现在的法理和实体法律基础,答辩是一项诉讼权利,强制被告提交答辩状在法理上行不通,逻辑上无法解释。毋庸置疑,各个制度之间唯有实现良好的衔接,才能在固定争点、防止突袭、实现公平与效率方面发挥其应有的价值,而作为制约整个诉讼后续进程的被告答辩制度,更是起到了"牵一发而动全身"的作用。在我国,被告答辩的形式、内容、效力以及不答辩的法律后果均未像大陆法系和英美法系国家那样明确作出规定,程序设计未能与其他制度实现顺利衔接,从整体上制约了纠纷的快速有效解决,法官释明制度也缺乏明确具体的规定,改革的急迫性日益凸显。With the civil pretrial procedure reformation,and the plea system,the proof limitation system,the evidence exchange system,the pretrial conference system have been gradually established. The design of the systems in the full pretrial preparation procedure,at the same time,to lay a solid foundation for the disputes in a timely and effective,fair and equitable solution. It is entirely possible that the systems can achieve good connections with each other,in order to prevent the raid,fixed point of contention,achieve fairness and efficiency as its value. As the constraints of the follow- up process of the plea system plays a ＂ domino effect＂. In our country,the defendants in the form,content,effectiveness,and the legal consequences of the respondent did not clearly stipulated,unlike the continental law countries and common law countries. Program design and other system to the smooth implementation of the overall convergence,restricted the fast and effective dispute resolution. Judges interpretation system is also lack of clear and specific provisions,the urgency of reform highlights.

关 键 词：司法改革 强制答辩 法官释明 被告提交答辩状 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]