“编委送审制”初探及与“编辑送审制”比较——以《北京航空航天大学学报》为例  

Invitation for peer review by editorial board members and comparison with invitation by editorial staff members: Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics as example

作　　者：李晶[1] 张嵘[1] 相艳[2] 

机构地区：[1]<北京航空航天大学学报>编辑部,北京100191 [2]北京航空航天大学基础与人文社科研究院,北京100191

出　　处：《编辑学报》2016年第2期153-155,共3页Acta Editologica

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(5010002015407001)

摘　　要：以《北京航空航天大学学报》为例,阐明"编委送审制"的运行模式,并就送审时间和审回时间,以统计学方法与"编辑送审制"进行比较,体现出它在提高审稿速度上的优势。提出了完善和创新审稿模式的措施。Invitation for peer review is the key link of ensuring the academic quality of sci-tech journals. Taking Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics as an example, the operation mode of the invitation for peer review by editorial board members is explained. Then the sending and receipt time of peer review with the invitation for peer review by editorial staff are compared using statistics. The results show the advantages of invitation for peer review by editorial board members. Finally the measures how to improve and innovate the system of invitation for peer review are put forward.

关 键 词：送审模式 编委送审制 编辑送审制 审稿速度 比较 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]