检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李春江[1]
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第8期60-60,共1页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的对比喉罩麻醉和气管插管麻醉应用于婴儿麻醉的临床治疗效果。方法 2010年1月~2011年12月我院共选取了53例婴儿患者来进行研究分析,将其分成A和B组,A组为治疗组,使用喉罩麻醉,B组为对照组,使用气管插管麻醉,对两种麻醉效果、术后恢复以及术后并发症等进行对比分析。结果 A组拔管和清醒时间等指标均要低于对照组,喉罩麻醉效果好,术后恢复快,效果优于气管插管麻醉。结论喉罩麻醉简单便捷,拔管时间短,清醒快。Objective To compare the effect of laryngeal mask anesthesia and endotracheal intubation anesthesia in infant anesthesia. Methods From January 2010 to December 2011, 53 cases of infant patients in our hospital were selected to conduct research and analysis, divided them into group A and group B, group A received a laryngeal mask anesthesia, group B received tracheal intubation anesthesia. The effects of anesthesia, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications of the two methods were compared and analyzed. Results The extubation time and awake time were lower in group A than the group B, the laryngeal mask anesthesia effect was good, the recovery was fast, the effect was better than tracheal intubation anesthesia. Conclusion The laryngeal mask anesthesia is simple and convenient, the extubation time is short and patients awake fast.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.145.114