检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王明仙
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第8期116-117,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探究改良腹式横切口与纵切口子宫下段剖宫产效果的对比。方法选取我院2012年3月~2015年9月收治的160例剖宫产产妇,根据剖宫手术切口不同可分为横切口组和纵切口组,分别采用改良腹式横切口和传统腹式纵切口进行剖宫产,比较两组临床效果。结果不同腹式切口下,横切口组平均开腹出血量、手术时间、术中出血量及术后排气时间均低于纵切口组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论相比较传统腹式纵切口,采用改良腹式横切口进行子宫下段剖宫产的手术效果更好。Objective To compare the clinical effects of the modified abdominal transerse incision and longitudinal incision for caesarean section. Methods 160 parturient women were divided into two groups and given modified abdominal transverse incision and longitudinal incision of caesarean section respectively, who were treated in our hospital from March 2012 and September 2015, the clinical effects in the two groups were compared. Results Under different abdominal incision, the abdominal bleeding, operative time, blood loss and postoperative time in transverse incision group were significantly reduced compared with the longitudinal incision group(P0.05). Conclusion Compared with longitudinal incision, modified abdominal transverse incision of caesarean section is more effective.WANG Mingxian, Luliang County People's Hospital Qujing 655600, Chin1
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104