检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]杭州行政学院,杭州310024 [2]都江堰市行政学院,四川都江堰611800
出 处:《甘肃行政学院学报》2016年第1期92-104,129,共13页Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
基 金:国家哲学社会科学基金项目(1BJY086)
摘 要:农村宅基地使用权隐性流转普遍存在,一户多宅、隐性占用、违法出售和触及法律的联合建房等隐性流转行为仍在继续发生。这些隐性流转行为为什么不能彻底禁止?其根本原因在于宅基地产权制度模糊和监管失灵、宅基地法律产权和事实产权不一致以及宅基地现实价值和潜在价值的提升。显然,完善法律规制、严格监管和完善利益调节机制是规制宅基地隐性流转的可行途径。It's very common that rural housing land use right circulates implicitly, a household multi-occupied housing land,implicit occupied housing land, the unlawful sale and touch on the joint construction of the law continued to occur. Why can't atotally ban the circulation of these implicit? Its root cause lies in the homestead's fuzzy and regulatory failure, the homestead lawof property right system of property rights and the fact property rights is inconsistent, as well as promotion of homestead real val-ue and potential value. It is clear that perfect legal regulations, strict supervision and perfect the adjustment mechanism of inter-est is recessive flow regulation homestead a feasible approach.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49