检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄永群[1] 梁秀红[1] 熊妮[2] 邹东华[1] 唐艳[1] 龙良[1] 陈宝玉[2]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第303医院老年病科,南宁530021 [2]中国人民解放军第303医院护理部,南宁530021
出 处:《广西医科大学学报》2016年第1期176-178,共3页Journal of Guangxi Medical University
基 金:广西壮族自治区卫生厅课题资助项目(No.Z2012473)
摘 要:目的:研究协同护理对于老年冠心病患者生活质量的影响。方法:将104例老年冠心病患者随机分为实验组(52例)与对照组(52例)。对照组运用常规护理模式,实验组采用患者及家属参与的协同护理模式。分别在护理干预前和干预后运用西雅图心绞痛调查问卷(SAQ量表)和一般健康问卷(GHQ-28量表)评定两组患者的生活质量,并统计SAQ量表和GHQ-28量表评分。结果:护理干预后,两组患者SAQ量表和GHQ-28量表评分均有所提高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组生活质量优于对照组。结论:运用协同护理模式可明显提高老年冠心病患者的生活质量。Objective:To study the effects of collaborative care intervention for elderly patients with coronary heart disease on their quality of life. Methods:A total of 104 participants were separate into two groups, experimental group (52 cases) and control group (52 cases). Quality of life were tested by SAQ and GHQ-28 before and after the care. Control group was carried into regular care, while experimental group was carried into collaborative care. The data were analyzed and compared by SPSS 19.0. Results. After the implementation of care, the quality of life of the two groups had improved, and the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈0.05). Experimental group experienced better quality of life than control group. Conclusion:Collaborative care might improve the quality of life of elderly patients with coronary heart disease.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.104.114