SFA与GSA的实证对比研究:效应与局限  

An Empirical Study of SFA Compared with GSA: Effects and Limitations

作　　者：巩华锋 

机构地区：[1]山西建筑职业技术学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《山西经济管理干部学院学报》2016年第1期102-106,共5页Journal of Shanxi Institute of Economic Management

基　　金：山西省教育科学"十二五"规划职业技术教育专项课题"高职院校建筑专业双语教学模式实践研究"(ZJ-12018)

摘　　要：SFA和GSA是侧重点不同的两种语言分析方法,在对同一所高职院校的学生分别进行SFA和GSA的语篇教学实践后得知:两种方法都取得了一定的成效,而且效果差异并不明显;两种方法都可以促进学生学习成绩的提高,并有利于教学相长;语篇教学实践中要语法和意义并重,同时需要综合考虑学生认知水平、教学内容重难点、词汇语用意义等多方面的因素。SFA and GSA,are two different linguistic analysis methods. The empirical study is beneficial to considering the role of the two methods in the specific student groups. Control experiments made in different majors of the same high vocational colleges result in that： both methods have achieved some success,and the difference is not obvious. Both methods can improve the academic performance of students,and is conducive to both teaching and learning. Discourse teaching practice should focus on both grammar and meaning,and the selection of these two methods should be based on comprehensive consideration of students,the important and difficult points of teaching content and the pragmatic meanings of words,etc.

关 键 词：SFA GSA 对比研究 效应与局限 

分 类 号：G642.4[文化科学—高等教育学]