刑罚目的新界说  

New Territories, Said the Purposeof Penalty

作　　者：李永升[1] 冯文杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2016年第2期19-30,共12页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

基　　金：中央财政支持地方高校建设项目"特殊群体权利保护与犯罪预防研究创新团队"

摘　　要：刑罚目的概念指国家制定、适用与执行刑罚所追求的客观效果,国内刑罚目的一元论、二元论以及一体论的解构皆未超出国外三类刑罚目的观暨报应论、预防论、并合论之界定的范围。刑罚目的观念界定关乎刑罚制定、适用与执行的决策样态,进而关乎公众基本权利的保障方式与方法,必须必须结合不断变化的时空、社会情势、刑罚目的法理,在较为可靠而合理的刑法基本立场上,在不同维度上对其作一合情合理的分析与界定。预防主义在刑罚运作层面不具有运用的合理性与正当性,报应与预防的对立统一在于刑罚理念层面而不在于刑罚运作层面,公正报应是刑罚的可应用于刑事活动的目的,社会化的维持与良性发展是刑罚的根本目的。The purpose of penalty refers to objective effect that the country pursues in penalty＇s establishment, application and enforcement. Domestic theories, such as dualism, monism and integrative theory,has not exceeded the scope of three foreign theories on purpose of penalty, including retribution, prevention and compromise. The view on purpose of penalty is underlying in penalty＇s establishment, application and enforcement, then relating to the protection way and method of the public fundamental rights. It is necessary that purpose of penalty is defined and analysis reasonably from different perspectives, based on reliable and reasonable fundamental position in criminal law and combined with the changing time and space, the social situation, jurisprudence of the purpose of penalty. Prevention doctrine does not have rationality and legitimacy in the operational level of penalty. Retribution and prevention means the unity of opposites in conceptual level rather than the operational level. Justice retribution that can be applied to the criminal activities is the goal of penalty, and maintain and healthy development of socialization is the fundamental purpose of the penalty.

关 键 词：报应主义 预防主义 并合主义 社会化的维持与良性发展 

分 类 号：D914.1[政治法律—刑法学]