苏轼推尊词体说献疑  

Doubts on Su Shi's Preference for Ci-poetry

作　　者：王卫星 

出　　处：《广西民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第2期166-170,共5页JOURNAL OF GUANGXI MINZU UNIVERSITY:PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION

摘　　要：学界普遍将苏轼认定为推尊词体论的先驱,这是对尊体内涵及苏轼词体观的误解。其实,苏轼并未改变唐末以来诗尊词卑的文体价值观,故真正要推尊的并非是柔美的合体词,反而是宏壮似诗的变体词。苏轼提出的词、画为"诗余""诗、画本一律"与词"盖诗之裔"等观念,被学界公认为尊体论据,但体现出的却是贬抑词体的态度。尽管如此,苏轼词及词论在客观上确实起到了推尊词体的作用,这也是其被误解为尊体论的根本原因。In academic circle, Su Shi is generally regarded as a forerunner who advocated Ci--poetry, which is caused by misunderstanding the connotation of style preference and Su Shi＇s view on Ci--poerty. Actually, sticking to the stylistic value passed down from the late Tang Dynasty according to which Poetry is of greater value than Ci-- poetry, Su Shi appreciated the variant of Ci-- poetry with sublime power of the Poetry rather than Ci--poetry, which is considered more tender and delicate. Su Shi raised some distinctive points, such as ＂Ci--poetry and painting are all the surplus of Poetry＂, ＂poetry and painting share the same nature＂ and ＂Ci--poetry is the evolution of poetry＂, which have been ac- knowledged in the academic circle as arguments to support Su Shi＇s preference for Ci--poetry. However, careful analysis of the original text reveals his true atti- tude to slighting Ci--poetry between the lines. All the same, Su Shi＇s works and theory of Ci--poetry obiectively help venerate Ci--poetry, which is another fundamental cause for being misunderstood as the advocator of Ci -- poetry.

关 键 词：苏轼 词体现 尊体论 

分 类 号：I207.209[文学—中国文学]