论法条竞合与想象竞合的区分及其适用原则——兼论军职罪中封闭的特权条款  

On the Distinction between Concurrence of Articles and Imaginative Concurrence and Their Application Principles: Concurrently on Limited Special Articles of Crimes against Military Duties

作　　者：冉巨火[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学军事法研究中心,陕西西安710063

出　　处：《法学杂志》2016年第4期86-93,共8页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"军职罪修改的体系化设计研究"(项目编号:12CFX037)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：军职罪中存在封闭的特权条款,想象竞合与法条竞合必须加以区分。形式上,两罪构成要件要素之间存在特别或者交叉关系的为法条竞合;两罪构成要件要素之间既不存在特别关系也不存在交叉关系的则为想象竞合。在法条之间存在特别关系的情况下,应严格适用特别法优于普通法的原则。在法条之间存在交叉关系的情况下,原则上应适用重法优于轻法的原则,但存在封闭特权条款的除外。There exist limited special articles in crimes against military duties and therefore concurrence of articles and imaginative concurrence must be distinguished. Concurrence of articles refers to the case when special or cross relationships exist in constitutive elements,while imaginative concurrence occurs when neither special nor cross relationship exists. The principle of ＂priority of special articles＂should be strictly observed when there exists a special relationship between articles; the principle of ＂severe articles are superior to lenient articles ＂should be applied in principle,when a cross relationship exists between articles,with the exception of limited special articles.

关 键 词：军职罪 封闭的特权条款 法条竞合 想象竞合 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]