涉外所有权保留法律适用的分割制  

Division in Applicable Law of International Retention of Title

作　　者：吕岩峰[1] 宋姜美 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130033

出　　处：《法学杂志》2016年第4期102-109,共8页Law Science Magazine

摘　　要：所有权保留因为兼具债权与物权的双重性质,其法律适用问题单纯按照债权法律关系,抑或是物权法律关系解决,都难免有失偏颇。分割制作为美国第二次冲突法革命开始被广泛应用的制度,其主要的做法即是对案件中的各个特定问题分别进行选择,有利于实现判决结果的实质正义。从分割制自身的适用特点来讲,其可以有效地预防法律规避带来的不良后果,并且能最大限度地实现国际私法的价值。从所有权保留制度本身来看,其原因行为与结果行为具有不同特点,其债权法律关系和物权法律关系的相互交织,要求所有权保留的法律适用问题通过分割制解决。涉外所有权保留法律关系的适当法就应该是将该法律关系分割为包含主体缔约能力问题、买卖双方之间的法律关系问题、买卖涉及第三人利益等几个方面,分别适用不同的冲突规范,并通过世界各国立法例检验,证明分割制在涉外所有权保留法律关系的法律适用中有旺盛的生命力。The retention of title（ ROT） supports the dual nature of creditor＇s right and real property,therefore,the institution of ROT raises some difficulty in determining applicable law in international context. The Rule of depecage has been widely applied after the Second Restatement of Conflict of Law which aims at determining the law by analyzing different issues in order to achieve the essential justice in final judgment. The merits of depecage lie in,on one hand,the prevention of undesirable effect of evasion of law,on the other hand,it could maximize the value of private international law. From the perspective of the institution of ROT,the difference between the cause and effect,as well as the interaction of creditor＇s right and real property call for the application of the rule of depecage,i. e. The proper law of international ROT is to depecage legal relations by different issues which include the contractual capacity,the legal relation of both parties as well as the interest of the third party. Through the examination of national laws and regulations in the world,it is proved that the depecage has strong vitality in the applicable law of international ROT.

关 键 词：所有权保留 法律适用 分割制 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]