杭州互助献血者血液检测结果的分析探讨  

Analysis of blood screening results among reciprocal blood donors in Hangzhou

作　　者：凌霞[1] 吕蒙恩[1] 俞广舒[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省血液中心,浙江杭州310052

出　　处：《中国输血杂志》2016年第2期193-194,共2页Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion

摘　　要：目的比较分析互助献血者与自愿无偿献血者血液检测结果,探讨互助献血的安全性。方法对杭州地区2013年4-7月5 171人次互助献血者(互助献血组)和50 227人次自愿无偿献血者(自愿献血组)血液检测结果进行比较分析,采用SPSS20.0软件进行X2检验。结果互助献血组血液检测总不合格率高于自愿献血组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。互助献血组的血液核酸、HBSAg和梅毒抗体阳性率均高于自愿献血组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而2组间抗-HCV、抗-HIV阳性率差异无统计学意义。结论互助献血者血液检测指标相对风险较大,在献血前应加强宣传教育和正确引导。Objective To investigate the safety of reciprocal donors＇ blood, by comparatively analyzing the blood test re- sults between the reciprocal donors and non-reciprocal voluntary donors. Methods 5 171 reciprocal blood donors and 50 227 non-reciprocal volunteer blood donors were recruited from April 2013 to July 2013 in Hangzbeu. All blood screening data were analyzed with the method of variance an^iysis ~y using SPSS20.0 software. Results Failure rate in blood test in the re- ciprocal group was higher than the non-remunerated volunteer group （P 〈 0. 01 ）. The positive rates of the nucleic acid, HB- sag and Syphilis in the reciprocal group were higher than those of volunteer group, respectively （P 〈 0. 05）. However, the positive rate of HCV and HIV showed no significant differences between these two groups. Conclusion The blood from re- ciprocal donors carries more risks than the blood from non-remunerated volunteer donors, Education should be promoted and right guidance should be provided before blood donation.

关 键 词：互助献血 自愿无偿献血 血液检测 安全性 

分 类 号：R446[医药卫生—诊断学]